We have completed the service we provided to our client, whose ERP migration process had come to a standstill due to technical and strategic errors originating from both the software manufacturer and the application partner. The purpose of this service was to analyze the current situation, develop a strategic recovery plan, and determine a roadmap. Our client experienced significant problems during the transition to the new ERP, incurred costs, and after spending time on the project with their own team and partner company, was unable to implement the new ERP system.
Sample solution suggestions
In today’s world, where adapting to evolving digital processes is inevitable, many companies are focusing on transitioning to a new ERP system with the goal of increasing efficiency. However, poorly planned processes and incorrect partner selections, wrong decisions, misguided implementations, and misdirection can sometimes turn these major investments into a “technological and motivational dead end.”
Current Situation Analysis: Why Did It Fail?
As a result of the initial reviews conducted by our management consulting team, the key factors leading to the project’s failure were identified as follows:
- Lack of Process Analysis: Instead of developing business processes and adapting them to the ERP system, the company’s long-standing processes, which needed to be improved, could not be modernized; the current situation analysis was not conducted in sufficient depth.
- Partner Incompatibility: The implementing company’s failure to sufficiently understand the dynamics of the customer’s industry and the organization’s needs; consequently, its inability to provide the necessary guidance and direction to the company.
- Data Pollution and Data Governance: Failure to standardize data transferred from the old system to the new ERP structure; weakening of control over the data management process due to errors in prioritization, while expecting the existing data structure to be transferred to the new system as is.
New roadmap: Safe and Sustainable Transition
With the New Process Design and Roadmap we prepared to resolve the issues encountered, we created reasonable options to “build a solid foundation and take solid steps” instead of “patching things up.”
Modules that failed in the previous attempt were examined one by one, and the deadlocks were identified.
A roadmap was drawn up for the company, taking into account the current situation:
- What are the pros and cons if it continues with the current ERP and current partner?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages if it continues with the selected ERP and selected partner? What should it pay attention to and focus on?
- What would be the gains if it continued with the selected ERP and new partner?
- What would be gained and lost if it made a fresh start with a completely new partner and new ERP?
The importance of determining a phased system for the transition to live operation and focusing on a model that minimizes risk, starting with priority departments, was emphasized.
User compliance: It was conveyed that psychological and technical training support for end users should be increased to ensure rapid adaptation to the selected ERP.
Conclusion
With this consulting process, the company has entered a period of operational cleansing that will not only result in a technical ERP transition but also refresh its corporate memory. Our goal is to optimize the time lost due to incorrect choices and provide the company with a competitive ERP and digital infrastructure by demonstrating optimized processes and different roadmap options.
